Contractarianism
Imagine a world with no rules and no laws. You would
have an abundance of freedom. But a lack of security. Thomas Hobbes called this
"the state of nature." Hobbes imagined the State of Nature to be
rough, brutish, and just plain mean. Hobbes argued that people would be willing
to give up some of their rights to live under the protection of civilization.
Giving up a 'right' or 'rights' would occur under a
contract. Good acts do not violate the rational agreements that we've made.
Contractarianism is when people or parties come together and make an agreement
that benefits both parties and does not harm the other person or party.
Hobbes was Antirealist about morality. Hobbes believed
that we simply make morality up. Hobbes believed that when you get a group of
'free' 'self-interested' 'rational' individuals living together, morality will
simply immerge.
For example, we live next door to each other in the
state of nature. I grow apples. I like apples. I eat apple pie and other
apple-like things all the time. You grow oranges. You are sick of oranges, and
now you want apples.
How do you go about getting the apples from me?
You could just steal them, but I'll just steal your
oranges in return. Because I'm sick of apples.
So to resolve this issue, we make a contract.
I exchange a certain amount of apples for your
oranges, and we don't rob each other.
A
problem with contracts
We don't always agree to the contracts that we are in.
Many of us never agreed to be US citizens.
Thus, many of us didn't agree to follow the laws of
this country.
So when I get pulled over for running a red light, I
may be empowered to say that.
"I never agreed to the traffic laws."
I am still going to get a ticket.
While that might seem unfair to you. You do reap many
benefits from the laws that exist.
Benefits
from society
If your home is on fire, people will come put it out.
You can drink clean water for free etc.
Rights
imply obligations
So when you take from the common pot by enjoying the goods
that the system provides, you are expected to pay in.
You pay in when you pay taxes or attend jury duty.
Contracts protect us from what Hobbes called "the
war of all against all." Contracts put us in a state where we all get
along because we trust others to follow the contracts we all agreed to.
Prisoner
dilemma
You and an associate commit theft. Both of you are
caught by the police and put in separate rooms for interrogation. If you stay
silent, both of you will get a year on a lesser charge. If you rat your partner
out, you will go free, and your partner will get 3 years. You rat each other
out; you will both get two years. What may happen is that you will rat on your
partner because you don't know if you can trust them. This is a problem with contracts.
This is Defection.
Defection
Defection occurs when we break the contracts we either
agreed to or didn't agree to follow. Seeking our own interests. This happens
all the time. Like in traffic, when everybody goes for the merge lane, traffic
gets backed. This occurs less often with people that you know. No one likes it
when individuals break contracts that they didn't have to make because our
whole society is based on everybody keeping our word.
Reiterate
For a contract to be valid, the contractors must be
free. The contractor must be better off in the system that the agreement makes
possible than they would be outside it. This rules out slavery. You are always
better off outside of a system that doesn't enslave you, so slavery is never ok
under contractarianism.
The system may not work in your favor all the time.
But you must be better off in the system than you are on your own. Unlike
utilitarianism, divine command theory, or Kantianism, morality doesn't exist
until we make it up. There is nothing fundamentally real about morality. But it
becomes real as soon as we agree that it is real. Because once we agree to
particular rules, they become real and binding. This occurs all the time. When
we change our minds as a group, we simply modify the contract as a group. This
occurs explicitly when we change laws and implicitly with shifting social mores
Comments
Post a Comment